← All portfolio

Growth & Marketing

Customer Acquisition & Lead Management System

Built a repeatable paid-acquisition and lead-management system that moves Meta Ads inquiries from WhatsApp into qualification, consultation, proposal, and closing.

OperationalPaid acquisition · Lead quality · Funnel management
Role
Acquisition strategy, campaign management, lead qualification, funnel design
Timeline
Oct 2025 – Jun 2026
Stack
Meta Ads · WhatsApp · Google Sheets · Google Meet
System status
Operational
01 / Business problem

More inquiries were not the same as more opportunities.

Estetiik needed a repeatable way to generate demand beyond personal referrals, while keeping low-intent inquiries from consuming the same attention as serious interior-project prospects.

01Referral-led demand was inconsistent

Referral quality could be strong, but volume was difficult to control or scale.

02WhatsApp inquiry quality varied widely

Raw lead volume included different levels of intent, readiness, budget, and project fit.

03Lead context was easy to lose

Important project details, follow-up status, and next actions were spread across conversations.

04Marketing needed a visible commercial path

The useful question was not only how many leads arrived, but which ones progressed into consultation, proposal, and closing.

02 / System design

A visible path from paid attention to commercial conversation.

The system connects acquisition, qualification, lead management, and human consultation. Dedicated AI Sales and Lead Nurturing systems now extend this foundation, but are documented separately to keep responsibilities clear.

01
Meta AdsGenerate inbound demand
02
WhatsApp inquiryCapture first project context
03
QualificationReview intent and readiness
04
Lead managementStatus, context, next action
05
ConsultationGoogle Meet with human team
06
Site surveyWhen the project requires it
07
ProposalScope and budget estimate
08
ClosingHuman-led commercial decision
03 / What the system does

Built around the decisions that matter.

01Repeatable acquisition

Meta Ads became a controlled source of inbound project inquiries instead of relying only on referrals.

02Lead qualification

Prospects are reviewed using project detail, intent, readiness, consultation signals, and fit.

03Lead context

Project type, location, budget signals, qualification status, follow-up state, and next actions are organized in one operating view.

04Human consultation handoff

Qualified prospects move into a higher-context Google Meet or site-survey conversation rather than staying in chat.

05Funnel visibility

Consultations, surveys, proposals, and closings can be reviewed as stages rather than disconnected conversations.

06Clear system boundaries

Conversation automation and lifecycle nurturing are handled by separate systems, keeping this case focused on acquisition and lead management.

04 / Measured outcome

The funnel became measurable beyond raw lead volume.

Approximate figures from campaign and pipeline records for October 2025 to June 2026.

IDR 24MMeta Ads spend
IDR 38.5KAverage cost per raw lead
~600WhatsApp inquiries
118Google Meet consultations
26Proposals sent
12Closings
WhatsApp inquiries
~600
Google Meet consultations
118
Site surveys
28
Proposals
26
Closings
12
05 / Before → after

Less scattered activity. More operating clarity.

Acquisition
Before

Primarily dependent on personal referrals.

After

Meta Ads became a repeatable inbound source.

Qualification
Before

No standardized way to separate serious prospects from low-intent inquiries.

After

Prospects were reviewed using project detail, readiness, and consultation signals.

Lead management
Before

Context and next actions were spread across WhatsApp conversations.

After

Lead details, status, follow-up state, and next actions were organized in one operating view.

Funnel visibility
Before

Commercial progress was difficult to review as one journey.

After

Consultations, surveys, proposals, and closings were tracked as connected stages.

06 / Proof of work

Built around a real operating workflow.

Actual artifacts are shown where they add context. Customer-identifying details should remain anonymized.

An anonymized view of the Estetiik lead management tracker
Operating artifactLead Management Tracker

Anonymized operating view used to organize prospect context, qualification, follow-up state, and next action.

Current state

Acquisition foundation

  • Paid acquisition and lead-management workflow is operational.
  • Raw inquiry volume is separated from qualified commercial progression.
  • Human consultation, survey, proposal, and closing remain central to high-value decisions.
  • The system acts as the acquisition foundation for the newer Sales and Nurturing layers.
Next layer

Deeper revenue visibility

  • Strengthen ad-to-lead attribution so campaign and creative quality can be evaluated beyond CPL.
  • Connect downstream qualified-lead and deal signals back to paid-media decision making.
  • Keep AI Sales and lifecycle follow-up as separate specialist systems instead of overloading this workflow.
Boundaries / limitations
Results are approximate and tied to the stated measurement window.Lead quality still requires human judgment for a high-consideration service.The original tracker is a lightweight operating system, not an enterprise CRM.No claim that automation itself caused the recorded closings.
Key takeaway

For a high-consideration service, the useful acquisition metric is not simply how many people message you. it is whether the right prospects keep moving through the funnel.

Start a conversation

Interested in discussing this system or a similar workflow?